Use of biocides and insect repellents and risk of hypospadias.

TitleUse of biocides and insect repellents and risk of hypospadias.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2010
AuthorsDugas J, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Martinez D, Iszatt N, Nelson P, Elliott P
JournalOccup Environ Med
Volume67
Issue3
Pagination196-200
Date Published03/2010
ISSN1470-7926
KeywordsCase-Control Studies, Disinfectants, England, Female, Humans, Hypospadias, Insect Repellents, Male, Maternal Exposure, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Risk Factors
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between the use of biocides and insect repellents and the risk of hypospadias was examined in a large case-control study in the South East of England. METHODS: A case-control study was carried out among 471 cases of hypospadias referred to surgeons, and 490 randomly selected population-based controls, born between 1 January 1997 and 30 September 1998. Telephone interviews were conducted between September 2000 and March 2003. The questionnaire included information on demographic, lifestyle and environmental factors, including the use of biocides and insect repellents, during pregnancy. A total biocide score was created from summing positive responses to an eight-item biocide exposure questionnaire. RESULTS: The use of insect repellent (adjusted OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.06 to 3.11) during the first trimester of pregnancy was associated with risk of hypospadias, but none of the biocides, or indicators for them, except for the total biocide score for the highest two exposure categories (score 3: adjusted OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.94; and scores 4 and 5 combined: adjusted OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.01 to 8.78) showed statistically significant associations. CONCLUSION: The authors found an association between the use of insect repellent and total biocide score and risk of hypospadias. In particular, the use of insect repellent warrants further investigation, specifically in relation to type, content and frequency of use since this information was missing in the current study.

DOI10.1136/oem.2009.047373
Alternate JournalOccup Environ Med
PubMed ID19951933